Sunday, January 18, 2015

Hiding on Twitter … Private vs Public Profiles


[Various Social Media Logos]


How I’d LOVE to hide on Twitter.

Before you ask why (or what) … I’ll ask (and answer):

What does this have to do with snapshots or Project: 365” … quite a bit if you’ve read the last few blogs:



That’s where I presented the pitfalls of having a profile picture of myself and an actor and how it led to a bit of a misunderstanding with me and another one of his fans. She was a French speaking fan, and I had to use Google Translate, and a slight language barrier.  

While it turned out with a positive ending (she blocked me when I replied to her in response to her messages to me), it was a wake-up call.  


Project: 365 – Privacy and Social Media



This blog is where I stated why I preferred using Facebook over Twitter to share pictures on – highlighting the privacy settings of Facebook, and how I may not continue the project on Twitter in light of certain events related to “photo stealing”.


Social Media and Intellectual Property Theft



This is where I discussed the severity of something that happened in December 2014, and why it was a bigger issue than some people thought.
In this research, it led me to an incident in New Mexico where a woman is suing artist Anne Taintor for using an old high school photograph with a snarky message on a flask.

One of the many articles I referenced:

NM woman sues over yearbook photo, novelty flask


And, how we can set about changing the “sign of the times … this will never change” mindset by awareness, education, vigilance, and privacy.


Finally … the one that started it:

Online Privacy and Fake Memories



This is where I discussed how the discovery of a modern digital photo was used to represent kids from “long ago” (circa 1970’s) and one of the people mentioned in it commented on it to perpetuate the “fake profile” theory.

However, the blog highlighted bigger problems than someone using it to validate another fake profile.

I mentioned how a friend’s Facebook post about the photo highlighted the complacency a few friends took with regard to online safety and being aware that some people are not at all who they seem.

In addition, it highlighted the need for perhaps making profiles more private, and watching what we share and WHO we share that information with.

This is where this blog is heading … 

I never give out personal information to people I don’t know. I certainly don’t post my address online, my telephone numbers, my email addresses. I try not to show too many family photos (unless the family is deceased) on Twitter. I try to keep it for public use – things I don’t mind letting out because they might come out any way or would be out as a result of being in a public place such as a theme park, racetrack, mall, etc.

My primary profile is on there to interact on a personal level with friends and some businesses, etc. With businesses I share good experiences, compliment service, and sometimes complaints.

I do have a secondary account which is a business account. I haven’t been using too much here lately. I’m hoping to begin focusing on that in the near future.

I save Facebook for family and VERY close friends – sometimes it is family only depending on the content I am sharing.  

On Facebook and Twitter … I also like to post my “picture of the day” or rather “Project: 365” photo.

Given what I learned in December, I’m hesitant about sharing my photos on Twitter. On Facebook, I have greater privacy controls for the reasons stated here and in the blogs too.

With Twitter my profile choices are either:

PRIVATE
PUBLIC

I’d like to be to select the “PRIVATE” option as Twitter doesn’t have detailed options, nor a “share direct” feature like Instagram does.

 I run into certain problems if I choose a “PRIVATE” profile:

1.) Unless people are following me, there’s a good chance they won’t see my tweets if I were to tweet a reply to them or a general “hi, great service” kind of tweet

2.) I can’t interact for the purposes of giveaways (yes, I enjoy those)

3.) People who want to follow are often turned off by the “PRIVATE, PROTECTED TWEETS” status– I’ve been blocked as well during the short time I had a “PRIVATE” account – the only reason? PRIVATE account.

Some celebrities have even taken issue with those who have “PRIVATE PROFILES” when you follow them. This I know firsthand from reading a particular celebrity’s tweets, and no I am not going to name them. They, like most of us, have their reasons.

As I stated in one of the blogs …

that doesn’t sit well with some potential followers, even famous people. Some have openly expressed the fact they feel that by asking to follow someone on Twitter it is an audition of sorts and one stated “why be private if you’re going to be online”. They feel you have something to hide …

Of course I have something to hide (like others) – but not for the wrong reasons.

Some people are “PRIVATE” on Twitter because:

1.) Perhaps they don’t want to share their life or memories for someone else to steal them (as what I have shown in previous blogs and mentioned here)

2.) Maybe they have a stalker (or someone who is bullying them) and don’t want them to know where they live or what is going on. After all, they shouldn’t have to give up living their life in order to accommodate a stalker or bully, that’d be re-victimizing them over and over.

3.) Perhaps it is a military family member who is keeping in contact with their family/friends back home; or the other way around (OpSec and all)

4.) It might be a teen’s account and being private is part of an agreement between parent and child in order to have the account – usually the account is for interaction with long-distance family and friends; family-friendly accounts/content; etc.

With that said, celebrities should know #2 more than anyone. They can always elect to block the “private” person or simply ask “why do you have a private profile” before blocking. I’d have no problem explaining why, as most honest people likely would. It is their choice overall  just something to consider.

They should also understand #3 as well – after all the good guys aren’t the only ones who use Twitter or social media. Don’t we all know about “loose lips sink ships” – Operational Security (OpSec)?

Number four (4) could be viewed as responsible parenting and responsible use of social media. It should be applauded as a way to keep kids safe while learning about the “online world”.

Personally, I would like a feature that Facebook offers: being able to create lists of who to post what content to. That’d make Twitter better and safer as well. But, I get the point. Some people are just leery of those who want to be private. I get it, but there are cases as to why private profiles exist. 

As I also said in my other blogs, I get that each social network wants to be different (it’s why some users favor one over the other). When it comes to privacy, that’s where you can’t have just two choices, it’s not feasible. Even Google + (G+) has “circles” you could create to post specific content to – if the person wasn’t in the circle, they didn’t see the content.

In an age where we’re trying to be so connected, we end up connecting with the wrong people. In some respect we’re all bullied near daily – whether it be on a Facebook post about our reaction to a devastating and somewhat personal event, or something we might feel strongly about … each day someone will get bullied. Privacy settings help us stay connected to those we want to and stay away from those we don’t. They are essential to controlling the way we interact and protect ourselves – even how we protect our family.

Facebook has greater privacy control than Twitter.  Even Instagram has better privacy control options (at least on the phone app).

For our safety, we’re told to lock down our social media, but yet we’re ostracized for doing so or made to feel bad for doing so. As an adult, that is confusing. To a child? I can’t even imagine where their level of confusion would be with “lock down your social media, what are you hiding for, why are you being private while online?” I’m confused. But, I’ve read it. On one hand people tell you to watch what you post on social media, but they ask why you’re being so secretive.

That makes NO sense to me. Those who know me will tell you – I’m pretty darn smart (even my college transcripts indicate that), and I catch on quickly.

I’ve had protected accounts follow me; usually there isn’t a problem when I ask to follow them. Most people approve it within 24 hours. If I send a request and they accept, fine it’s all good. After all, I can always block them if I don’t like their content. If they don’t approve my request in a timely manner, I will block them – haven’t had to do that too often though.

Here’s how I look at it on Twitter … unless you’re comfortable with me following you back, don’t follow me. I don’t mind asking to follow someone with protected tweets. It isn’t an audition – it is in most cases for their safety and security – and I respect that – just as I would expect my privacy, safety, and security respected as well.  

So, the next time someone asks any of those questions on Twitter (“why do you have a private profile”, etc.) … I might just direct them to this blog as it’d take far too many tweets to explain it.

And, when someone suggests I protect my tweets, I’ll also direct them here – sometimes it isn’t as easy to explain as it seems.  

Thursday, January 8, 2015

Unwanted Attention – Privacy, Special Photos, and Social Media

Lately it seems that a lot of “social media” stuff is inspiring my blogs – particularly the photography ones. That I apologize for. I’d hoped to be talking about fun stuff – and I’m going to try to get back to that as soon as I address a few issues.

These are things that have happened to me over the last several months (some days apart) and some I’ve been part of. But, I’d like to let people know what’s been going on.

This latest incident started off on January 3rd with a Facebook message to me … in French.

First of all, my name maybe French (and I am of French descent with a mix of several other things – Native American, English, etc), but I am an American. My mom’s family roots go back to the Revolutionary War. I also only speak English (or American as I call it). So, needless to say, I was perplexed as to what was going on and what this woman was trying to ask – in addition – why was she trying to ask it of me?

This was not someone I know, but obviously was a fan of the same actor I am a fan of, one that I recently met as well.

Apparently, because I had made a comment on one of the actor’s Facebook posts (and who hasn’t), and because my profile picture is that of me and said actor … this “fan” messaged me.

As of note … I am not the only person to comment on a celebrity’s Facebook page/post or tweet a celebrity – though I don’t do it very often. Usually it is a “thank you” or compliment on an episode of their series (mainly I interact with them on Twitter).

Many people do it and some celebs love interacting with their fans (at least the respectful and polite fans). Dale Earnhardt Jr. and other NASCAR celebrities often do impromptu “Q & A” (question & answer) sessions with the fans.

After all, they wouldn’t post a “what do you think”, “what kind of questions do you have”, or post if they didn’t want comments or the interaction. 

I am also not the only person who has used a picture of themselves with their favorite personality as a profile picture – scour Facebook or Twitter, and you will see it. I know of a few friends who have their profile photos set to that of them with their favorite celebrity. It’s nothing new. And, they have been doing it for years. There is nothing dishonest about it, so long as you are not pretending to be officially associated with that celebrity; i.e: wife, significant other, sibling, etc.

With that said …

I looked at the message and was like: “what is this, how do I reply”.

As it turned out she obviously thought my personal page was the actor’s page (perhaps she thought it was his personal page). Why I have no idea, as he has his own “professional” page; mine is “personal” with my real name. She was apparently telling me how much she loved the actor (thinking I was the person) and things of that nature. Things she’d expressed in numerous (at least 4-5) comments to the actor on the same post I’d commented ONCE on.

I wanted to reply to tell her that I didn’t know what she was saying and obviously I had no official connection to the celebrity (rather than misled her into thinking so). So, I took to Google translate to find out what it was she’d said to me.

I politely told her that I was not connected to the actor and that I was just a fan who’d been lucky enough to meet him over the summer, and that was where my profile picture originated. I explained that I used Google to translate and apologized. Simple, done. I thought that would end it.

It didn’t.

The next morning (January 4th), I got another message from the person. That one I didn’t even know what she was asking. It translated to “you find out how”. Maybe she was wondering why I was replying to her, forgetting she had sent me the message the day before (hey, it could happen; only thing I have to think of). 

Not knowing French (or another language) is a barrier to politely solving the issue. When you don’t know what someone is asking, you don’t know how to reply without risking an insult.

And, you also don’t want to risk agitating the person either (not knowing if it is an innocent inquiry or a sinister investment).

Again, as politely as I could … I told her I didn’t know what she was asking/saying; that I wasn’t officially connected to the actor; and apologized for the confusion. I hoped that would end it. I know she (or someone on the account) saw the reply 4-5 minutes after I posted it. I was hoping that would definitely be the end of it.

As with most things of this nature, I got to thinking … and that wasn’t good in this case, or in any case.

That picture that people treasure of themselves and their favorite celebrity/person (actor, NASCAR driver, musician, etc) might attract unwanted attention from others – especially when used as a profile photo.

While it is a treasured photo, and definitely one to be proud of, it paves the way for this kind of attention/interaction. Some of that might be innocent and some not so innocent.

When I first planned this blog out I had no idea what her motives were and was prepared to “block” if necessary. I am of course no stranger to blocking people. I’ve had to for various reasons.

On the early morning of January 6th I checked to make sure she hadn’t replied to me. I noticed “You cannot reply to this conversation” at the bottom of the message thread. 

I was filled with more relief than shock.

Apparently she blocked me almost two days after my reply to her. So, that ended quite well – which is good. This is a story with a positive ending and for that I am quite relieved. At least I don’t have to worry what her motives are or worry about any future contact from her.

This is not a new issue, at least not for me.

It started not long after my trip when there was an incident about the cover photo I chose for my “Twitter” cover. Turns out it was a misunderstanding as the person had no idea it was a replica license plate of a car from one of my favorite TV shows. That I wrote about in another blog:


[Seemingly innocent photo I took in June 2014 in New Jersey. Set off a series of events that almost led to me leaving Twitter]

This most recent incident is going to make me hesitate when choosing a particular profile/avatar photo to represent myself on social media accounts. I’m also going to hesitate on “Project: 365” when it comes to posting on Twitter. As I’m sure some people would hesitate (about the profile photo that is).

When using one of yourself, you identify as a real person and are more credible to others. You’re a real person (well, when you use a real photo of yourself that is).

When you have one of yourself with someone famous you met – there are some bragging rights and pride, not to mention it is a memorable event that you want to share with family and friends.

But, you also run the risk of unwanted attention – such as this message from a “fan”. That may not be a good thing in the long run, depending on their motives.

If you use a “generic” photo it gives you some privacy and anonymity, though you risk being labeled as a phony or fake; even in some cases a stalker.

There’s really no winning in this one.

This person who I’ll refer to as “Elin” – is using a generic photo on their account. And, this is not their only Facebook account – they have another one (that they are friends with) under the same name (again, with a generic picture).

That was another concern about her interaction with me – the anonymity, and after some of the things I and a friend have been through over the last few years – it is creepy.

Thankfully (and I am hoping) this was a misunderstanding.

But, there is a lesson here:

Watch the profile pictures and be careful. You can inadvertently attract the wrong kind of attention. I got lucky in my case and this time.

The “attention” was something I hadn’t even considered when choosing the photo for my profile over six (6) months ago.

As of note, my profile picture on Twitter is my normal Facebook cover photo:

[This is the REAL me sitting in a replica of a famous TV series car. This was taken in New Jersey in June 2014]


I’ve been lucky with that profile photo … so far. 

Project: 365 – Privacy and Social Media

[Photo I took at a park close to where I live in Nevada]

Last year, before Christmas … this happened: (if you haven’t read that blog … please, do so now) …

“Online Privacy and Fake Memories” [
http://snapshotsandproject365.blogspot.com/2014/12/online-privacy-and-fake-memories.html]

To keep this introduction rather short, that blog was about a friend (“Li”) discovering that a friend of hers was lying. It started as a lie about Li’s friend being sick and culminated with the discovery of multiple accounts used to perpetuate the scam.

A picture was shared on one of the “fake” profiles and was supposed to be that of three children in obviously around 1976-1980 (given the birthdates of the people connected). One of the problems was that the photo was apparently stolen from a parent’s blog. I later found another picture of those same three kids, however posing with their parents (I am assuming). And, the kids were in those same clothes from the kids of “long ago”. That information is at the bottom of that blog.

It was that “photo stealing” incident that made me realize that sharing even a seemingly innocent picture online can soon become someone else’s memories, as the previous blog talks about. It can become someone else’s story, history, and life.

It makes people (like me) hesitant to share those precious memories – even if it’s a visit at a theme park that millions visit. I know for certain I wouldn’t want people using pictures of my family (or myself) to represent their “fake” family or themselves. I wouldn’t want someone else sharing my “great vacation” as theirs.

Sorry, but I find that just CREEPY! I wonder if someone else is using my pictures and I’m their daughter, wife, sister … or them. Yes, you can almost scare yourself into insomnia.

As a result of the incident in December, I concluded 2014’s “Project: 365”on Twitter on December 31st. And, I am a bit concerned about sharing “2015” on there. Even sharing my NASCAR photos or Bellagio Conservatory photos is “iffy” – especially considering that some don’t feel that it is a “big issue”.

As far as “personal” photos (me, my family, or people I’m with …) – I’m extremely leery, if not terrified to share them on Twitter where there are only two options for tweets:

PUBLIC
PROTECTED

While people might say “protect your tweets”, that doesn’t sit well with some potential followers, even famous people. Some have openly expressed the fact they feel that by asking to follow someone it’s an audition of sorts and one stated “why be private if you’re going to be online”. They feel you have something to hide. That is something I’ll address in another blog …

Anyway …

I started the 2015 edition of “Project: 365” on Facebook where I have greater control and privacy settings. Despite all the fun people want to poke at Facebook, it allows greater privacy for photos and posts – and that is something I am looking for.

I have created lists of people I “allow” to view my photos and certain posts. I can select just family, close friends, or everyone. I can mix and match per post or album. That is a better control than what Twitter gives me. I can have my connections without losing my privacy.

In light of all this stuff, I’d like to suggest that Twitter get on that bandwagon – and fast. Let us create lists of followers we want to broadcast to while still maintaining a public profile.

While each social network wants to be different – sometimes it isn’t always possible. Nor is it a good idea.

For right now, I’m going to take a “one day at a time” approach when it comes to sharing photos on Twitter. I might only post “non-descript” photos such as a movie DVD, ticket stub, flower, etc … and skip days with “personal” photos. I’m still undecided, however, I will continue to “watermark” my photos though. And, it is something I highly recommend.

The reason I started “water-marking” photos was because of a friend who shared a picture I’d taken before asking me if it was okay to do so. Memes and those images, I get sharing without permission – especially when they’re shared by public accounts or companies for that purpose.

This particular photo in question was one I’d taken of something I’d seen at a grocery store. It was one of my own photos – my own intellectual property, after all since I photographed it – I owned the copyright to it.

The photo was shared before I even got home – without asking permission, without a comment, without attribution to me. This friend went and shared it. They never apologized, but I have since taken corrective actions to ensure it doesn’t happen again. And, that is why I prefer Facebook when sharing photos – I have those privacy options to choose from.

I am leery about continuing to share my work. It’s not that I don’t want to share, but I want to do so responsibly and safely. I also want to keep my work as mine.

I also don’t want to be on a flask for someone else’s monetary gain either.

And, I’d recommend reading another blog here (where that is mentioned):


Social Media and Intellectual Property Theft

In response to an incident on Facebook, I wrote the following blog: “Online Privacy and Fake Memories” [http://snapshotsandproject365.blogspot.com/2014/12/online-privacy-and-fake-memories.html]. I highlighted the issue of fake memories stolen from people.

There was someone who thought it might have been deceptive, and it was “wrong, but not really a big issue to worry about”. Being deceptive is not a “big issue”? I find that a little hard to believe, especially when there are people who believe everything they read/see/hear online.

Another point that was made was that the person who shared a photo that wasn’t theirs – they weren’t the first or last person to do it, that it is a sign of the times and it won’t change.

That’s the kind of attitude and complacency that causes it to continue. It’s been excused so people keep excusing it; they’re so used to it happening it is second nature.

A recent case in the news (that’ll I get to later) highlights the lack of concern we have for this issue when it comes to intellectual property as well as our rights as people.

There is a HUGE concern when someone feels a deep need to swipe someone else’s photos, memories, or even a “life” to represent as their own – deceptive is not quite adequate – it is FRAUD. It amounts to virtual identity theft. Even if it isn’t for monetary gain – who is to say it wouldn’t lead there? [More on that later]

The person commenting (about it not being a big issue) was only concerned if it was being used for pedophilia purposes. As long as it wasn’t? “Being in the nature it was used … it was wrong, but not really a big issue”.

How about the fact that the people doing this are stealing someone’s family to represent themselves and becoming a voice for that family? That should worry anyone that someone else is being their voice.

“Joanna” (the person who was mentioned in the blog “Online Privacy and Fake Memories”) was using a picture (that she likely did not own or have permission to use) to represent herself, a twin brother, and this Lisa “long ago”.  And, this “Lisa” perpetuated the scam by commenting on the photo.

Being deceptive and dishonest puts the entire online community at risk – in addition, it is PLAGARISIM. They are STEALING someone else’s work and using it (even if it isn’t for monetary gain) as their own.

To be blunt … it is against the law. It is called INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY THEFT. And, it is something the FBI takes seriously.

If you were to publicly screen your own DVD copy of a movie that you bought – even if it isn’t for monetary gain (without permission of the distributor) – it’s still considered illegal. Read this warning (it’s from a WARNER DVD) …

[Picture of FBI warning – taken by me]

And one from a CBS/Paramount DVD: 

[Again, taken by me]

Intellectual property theft isn’t as “small” as some like to believe.

When someone (like myself) takes PERSONAL photographs, we are the “copyright” holder – despite the fact it might be a “public” place (Disneyland, etc). That is our work; that is our intellectual property. The images belong to us. They are for our use and distribution – no one else has the right to distribute them without payment and/or attribution use – even then the copyright holder might still retain their rights.

This is a good read:

“FBI Anti-Piracy Warning Seal” – note that it is under the section “Intellectual Property Theft”

Notice: “Copyrighted works can include, but are not limited to, films, audio recordings, electronic media, software, books, photographs, etc.” … I did. And, it is not a “victimless” crime. Even if it is not for monetary gain, there are victims involved.

Sounds serious, doesn’t it? Remember the person who said “wrong, but not really a big issue to worry about” … they’re wrong. And, they’re wrong in a big way.

To answer the person who said “sadly a sign of the times … this will never change” …

Yes it is a sign of the times, but it can change and you can do something about it – be more private. Watch what you share with and the people you share to.

Depending on what network you use and why you use it:

1.) Don’t be available in search (Facebook)

2.) Set “friend requests” to “Friends of Friends” (Facebook)

3.) Watch how many family photos you post and what details
          (Facebook & Twitter)

4.) Maintain the strictest possible privacy (Facebook & Twitter)
                    A.) Don’t be afraid to have lists on Facebook
                    B.) Don’t be afraid to de-friend or block on Facebook

5.) Watch who you friend (Facebook)

6.) Lightly watermark your photos (Facebook & Twitter)

7.) If anything seems suspicious – REPORT IT
          (Facebook & Twitter)

Just because something has been done (and repeatedly) doesn’t mean we should allow it to continue. We can take precautions by limiting what we do online to impact that privacy. We can make reports against people as well.

I don’t think we can stop it entirely, but there is nothing wrong with being vigilant about it and educating our friends to being a bit more cautious online.

Oh, and if my blogs aren’t convincing … remember I said something about a recent case in the news highlighting the lack of concern we have for the issue?

How about this:


Three more links:

New Mexico woman sues novelty company for putting her high school portrait on flask


NM woman sues over yearbook photo, novelty flask


Woman suing over use of her photo on flask


Just because it has happened, doesn’t mean we continue to let it happen.

Dunn said his office tried to get the issue resolved before filing the lawsuit, without success.

I received an email from Anne Taintor at one point when we first started talking that basically said ‘well, most people find this stuff funny – get over it.'” Dunn called the company’s response, “a really flippant way to think about somebody’s reputation.”


I think Mr. Dunn says it better than I can.