![]() |
| [Social Media Logos. Image found on Internet]
Back
in December 2014, I wrote a blog titled: “Online
Privacy and Fake Memories” [http://snapshotsandproject365.blogspot.com/2014/12/online-privacy-and-fake-memories.html].
It
was due to the fact that in December 2014; a friend (L) had called out someone about
a photo, supposedly back from the late70’s/early 80’s – which you can read about
on the above referenced blog. Turns out the kids photo was STOLEN from a
November 2014 blog. Even though the photo was backdated to 2008, on Facebook …
anyone can do that with their feature.
A
mutual friend (R) stated: “wrong, but not
really a big issue to worry about” in regards to the other friend’s
concern about the misuse of someone else’s photos.
Unfortunately,
as we saw in the case of the kids skiing photo, it didn’t stop there and was
not a victimless crime. It never really is; and it isn’t stopping either. As “L”
said – there are children involved in this that have no say.
It’s
called “Digital Kidnapping” or “Cyber Kidnapping”. Unfortunately it is a grey
(gray) area for law enforcement. Many of the laws on the books haven’t kept up
with the technology advances. Nevada just recently passed a specific law on “squatting”
(you can either research it or I will talk about it later).
As
I stated in the above blog, under an update, this was mentioned on the Today
show on 2/27/2015 [http://www.today.com/video/today/57041622#57041622]. It was even
mentioned in a news article: http://www.fox8live.com/story/28189979/digital-kidnapping-a-growing-trend
Here
is an April 2015 WHNT 19 (Huntsville, AL) news article excerpt:
“A
disturbing new trend is spreading across social media. People on social media
are stealing photos of other people’s children. It's called "digital
kidnapping."
The
term "digital kidnapping" may seem embellished to some, but the
victims who have pictures of their children stolen are left wondering why
someone would do this -- and what else are they capable of?” (Riopka, 2015).
You can read more here: “Digital
Kidnapping: Madison family finds their child targeted by online photo thief”
[http://whnt.com/2015/04/27/digital-kidnapping-madison-family-finds-their-child-targeted-by-online-photo-thief/].
Still
not convinced enough?
Yesterday
(May 12th, 2016), part two of a Dr. Phil episode featured a family
confronting the “digital kidnapper”. Warning … it is QUITE disturbing.
Here’s
the synopsis:
“Did a Stranger ‘Cyber Hijack’ a Couple’s Twins? A
Side-By-Side Photo Comparison.
April and Nathan claim a total stranger has been stealing photos
of their 4-year-old daughters and posting them as their own on social media.
In fact, they claim a woman named Ashley has stolen hundreds of
photos of the girls since they were born and has reposted them as if she were
their own mother.”
(link will be at the bottom of the blog).
Scary,
isn’t it?
I’ll
post links to the Dr. Phil videos. But, I do urge EVERYONE to read my previous
blog on it and WATCH the videos that I’ll link to later on.
In
another blog … “Social Media and Intellectual Property Theft” [http://snapshotsandproject365.blogspot.com/2015/01/social-media-and-intellectual-property.html]
I stated the following: “Another point
that was made was that the person who shared a photo that wasn’t theirs – they
weren’t the first or last person to do it, that it is a sign of the times and
it won’t change.”
As
a friend and I discussed, unless it happens to those kinds of people … they don’t
seemingly care. That’s the attitude that is going to keep it going and keep it
being “no big deal”.
There
is something emotionally disturbing about people who want to “steal” someone
else’s life or kids for an online profile. What’s worse is when they’re
confronted … they first continue the lie, perpetuate the lie, then without
emotion say “I didn’t mean you any harm” – as if that’s supposed to give the
victim the warm, fuzzy feeling. As if the victim is expected to say “oh, you
poor thing”.
In
the Dr. Phil case, the digital kidnapper (Ashley) is not really remorseful (her
lack of a real apology is apparent) and tries to keep the charade going. She
was asked by the real father of the kids (Nathan) to delete the photos some
three years ago – Ashley kept going on, even up to April 1st of this
year.
Then,
on Dr. Phil, her attitude reflects that she is supposed to be forgiven and “doesn’t
know why” she printed the photos and continued the charade. Watch the videos.
If
you (the reader) want to know how serious this is (and can be), picture this
scenario … if you will:
Doris
is a lovely, but lonely 56 year old lady. But, very lonely. She (in order to
combat the loneliness) makes up a story (after seeing a happy couple with two
kids) that she has custody of her two grandkids because their parents died in a
car crash.
She
shares pictures of her two grandkids (Janie and James) online and talks about
them constantly. As to why she isn’t in the picture with them? She says “oh, I
don’t take pictures of myself, they’re far more important to me after
everything they’ve been through”.
Her
online friend Mary sees Janie and James with another couple (at Disneyland).
Mary calls the cops because Doris is their grandma and their parents died … so
this couple must’ve kidnapped them, right? What is this couple doing with Doris’
grandkids? She didn’t say anything about the trip. After all the kids have been
through, why would Doris not take them herself?
Well
… what if Doris has been lying? What if she, like Ashley did, digitally
kidnapped Janie and James by stealing pictures from their parents’ social media
pages and reposted them as her grandkids?
And,
what would happen to Doris, Mary, the parents, and the kids when this is
uncovered?
See
what kind of trouble that can cause? Any wonder that back in December 2014 I
posted two blogs on the seriousness of this?
Now,
some might argue that perhaps Doris’ family might speak out. What if she has no
family to speak of, or is using an alias herself? How would we really know?
Here’s
the set of videos from the Dr. Phil episodes. They are in order according to the
website and “article”.
PART
ONE: “I Believe A Stranger Is Obsessed
With My Beautiful Twin Daughters and Has ‘Cyber Hijacked’ Them!” [http://www.drphil.com/shows/i-believe-a-stranger-is-obsessed-with-my-beautiful-twin-daughters-and-has-cyber-hijacked-them/;
May 11, 2016]:
“Mother Accuses Stranger Of ‘Digitally
Kidnapping’ Her 4-Year-Old Twin Daughters”
“Did a
Stranger ‘Cyber Hijack’ A Couple’s Twins? A Side-By-Side Photo Comparison”
“Woman Responds To Allegations She Digitally
Stole Photos Of Couple’s Twins & Posted Them As If They Were Her Own
Children”
“Parents Confront Woman Accused Of ‘Cyber
Hijacking’ Their 4-Year-Old Twins”
PART
TWO: “Will Ashley Confess”
“Parents Question How Framed Photos Of Their
Daughters Wound Up In Stranger’s Home”
“Woman Apologizes For ‘Digitally Kidnapping’
Couple’s Twin Girls: ‘I Really Don’t Mean You Guys Any Harm’”
“How a
Woman Used Social Media And Her Deceased Mother To Perpetuate A Story About
Having Twins”
I
apologize if this blog is almost like a newspaper (or magazine) to read. I urge
everyone to watch the videos above and follow basic steps for protecting one’s
family. What do I do?
1.)
I don’t allow many people access to my account. Not because I don’t have
several requests – I don’t know some of these people. I am not going for a “most
friends of all time” award. I want to know and interact with REAL people. If
they’re not someone I know (either we have a mutual friend; I’ve really met
them; or I can vet them) – I say “NO” to that friend request.
2.)
I am not comfortable allowing people to know where I live – after all, I don’t
know some of these people. I keep my Facebook LOCKED down by posting all “sensitive”
stuff to only those who have my address or who I’d let know where I live (family,
close friends).
3.)
I am not about to let strangers know when I am not going to be at home. So, I
keep that only for family (cousins, uncle, and my mom) and a few friends (who
are just as close as my family). That’s who I’m going to also show my vacation
posts to and pictures of my kids to. It also cuts down on potential suspects.
4.)
Watermark photos with something. Keep the originals in a safe place other than
a computer (flash drive works well and if you can on DVD, holds more than a CD).
Try to be accurate with the file dates.
5.)
Watch out for groups on Facebook. Predators can lurk here – which is obviously
what happened to the Willis family.
6.)
Never refer to kids by full name in a public post. Use Twin/Triplet #1;
Daughter #1; DD (dear daughter) #1; kid#1 (if family has multiple boys and
girls). Things like that. Also don’t reveal real birthdays.
7.)
Watch the frequency and type of postings.
I
said the following in another blog, but true here …
8.)
Don’t be available in search on Facebook
9.)
Set “friend requests” to “Friends of Friends”
10.)
Maintain the strictest possible privacy on Facebook and Twitter
A.) Don’t be afraid to have lists on
Facebook
B.) Don’t be afraid to de-friend or
block on Facebook
C.) Don’t be afraid to contact
authorities either
D.) Don’t be afraid to have one public
Twitter and one “family only” account. FYI: I think Twitter needs to have a
family only list or option.
11.)
If anything seems suspicious – REPORT IT IMMEDIATELY!!! Don’t forget to do your
homework, take screenshots, keep emails.
As
I said in a previous blog:
“Just
because something has been done (and repeatedly) doesn’t mean we should allow
it to continue. We can take precautions by limiting what we do online to impact
that privacy. We can make reports against people as well.
I
don’t think we can stop it entirely, but there is nothing wrong with being
vigilant about it and educating our friends to being a bit more cautious
online.”
But,
we should encourage legislators to pass stricter laws and penalties. Laws are
useless without enforcement.
I
do urge people to exercise as much caution as possible. And, as I also said:
This
is not just a "minor" matter. This crime has a name. And, there are
victims. And, those victims may be too young to speak for themselves.
|
Showing posts with label Family. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Family. Show all posts
Friday, May 13, 2016
Online Safety with Kids and Digital Kidnapping
Wednesday, February 18, 2015
Reflections: February 18th
It’s
hard knowing where to put this blog … so, I think “Snapshots and Project 365”
is the best place for it.
![]() |
| [My Project: 365 picture. Remembering Dale] |
Today
is the 14th anniversary of Dale Earnhardt’s death. Today would have
been my grandma’s 98th birthday (a grandmother I was named after). She died November 2002, a year and nine months after Dale. So today, there is a bit of sadness.
Fourteen
(14) years ago, she had NO idea who I was. She was in the late stages of
Alzheimer’s. So, I decided to watch the race here and there … except for the
last few laps. I had a lot to do, and I was a bit emotional. Though nothing like I would be later that night.
Later
that night, as I told my mom goodnight, I learned that Dale Earnhardt had died.
He was my racing hero – he made the impossible seem possible.
A lot has changed in those fourteen (14) years. I’ve attended ten (10), going on eleven (11) races at Las Vegas Motorspeedway. Speaking of that ... NASCAR will here in 15 days. I’ll watch Jeff Gordon race one last time here. I’ve seen a lot of my favorite drivers race here one last time, and I’ve seen people race here for the first time.
I’ve seen the Busch series race, the Nationwide, and soon the Xfinity Series. I’ve seen Nextel and Sprint. I’ve seen a lot of changes in the sport.
But that isn’t all. In the past fourteen (14) years I’ve personally changed in so many ways that I hardly recognize myself. I hardly resemble the young girl (24/25 year old) that heard that devastating announcement. I definitely am nowhere near the same post-9/11 person I was.
I’ve had extremely low points (9/11 was the “hit rock bottom” part), and I’ve “soared among the clouds” for the high points.
And,
I mean that quite literally. Last June I faced a demon – I flew from my home
in Las Vegas to Newark, NJ. One of the hijacked flights flew out of Newark, so
that was definitely staring the devil down. I flew in that airport and out of it. I actually boarded a total of four (4) aircraft to take a remarkable journey.
| ["D" gate at McCarran International just before boarding my Delta flight to Atlanta Hartsfield-Jackson Airport; first of two for the trip back to New Jersey.] |
| [A bit delayed leaving Atlanta for Newark due to a patch of bad weather. Checking for flight arrival information. I'd land in time to check in to my hotel. Check-in was 4pm] |
| [Making the descent into Newark, NJ. Seeing toll booths for the first time. We really weren't that late as it turned out. Both flights were awesome. Scary, but awesome.] |
I
got to see (from Liberty State Park) the World Trade Center and Statue of Liberty:
| [One of my FAVORITE pictures of the World Trade Center. Taken June 28, 2014] |
| [My view of the Statue of Liberty. Taken June 28, 2014] |
Today,
I realize how many blessings I really have. I’ve been able to experience things
I never thought possible. Today I realize how much of Dale’s “never give up” spirit is still inspiring me. I’ve met wonderful people, met my childhood heroes, met
people who’ve inspired me. I’ve been to some remarkable places and done
remarkable things (even gone to concerts):
![]() |
| [Met Gary Sinise at the CSI: Experience. November 2011] |
![]() |
| [Attended a Lt. Dan Band concert at the Mandalay Bay. November 2011. One of many "free" free concerts I've been to.] |
![]() |
| [Saw the original "Starsky" Ford Gran Torino from Seasons 2-4. Newark, NJ June 26, 2014] |
![]() |
| [Met and had dinner with David Soul (Hutch) and Paul Michael Glaser (Starsky). I was part of a select few who did. Newark, NJ June 26-28 2014] |
I’ve
reconnected with my family, and those bonds are stronger than they were. I’ve
reconnected with some friends, lost touch with others, lost some entirely, and
made some new friends. But, life goes on. And,
I learned the importance of this message:
![]() |
| [Inspirational card I made to remind myself to "keep going". Made through my Heritage Makers business] |
I
can see why Dale was so tenacious on the track, it is a trait of those born
under the Taurus the Bull sign – I know, I was born on the same day. Once I
rose up, I never stopped. I kept going. Much like Dale (and
like another person I admire and was lucky to meet) … you just keep going.
Today,
I miss Dale. I’m sad; I can’t say I’m not. But, like his son Dale Jr. stated on
Twitter … I’m glad he lived:
![]() |
| [Dale Jr's tweet] |
I
don’t think I’ll ever stop wondering “what if”, but I’m not so bogged down in
the “what if” that I can’t see the “what
can be” in front of me.
“I hope you never fear those mountains in the distance
Never settle for the path of least resistance
Livin’ might mean taking chances, but they’re worth takin’
Lovin’ might be a mistake, but it’s worth makin’
Don’t let some hell bent heart leave you bitter
When you come close to sittin’ out, reconsider
Give the heavens above more than just a passing glance
And when you get the choice to sit it out or dance …
I hope you dance … ”
That
song always seems to play at the right time. Do I cry? Sometimes. But, through
those tears, I still smile. Why? Because, I know exactly what give the heavens above more than just a passing glance really means:
| [My view as I head home to Las Vegas from Detroit. Delta Airlines Flight 1917; DTW to LAS; June 2014] |
| [In case anyone needed to see this to believe it. Yes, I still have all my boarding passes from that trip.] |
Thursday, January 8, 2015
Social Media and Intellectual Property Theft
In
response to an incident on Facebook, I wrote the following blog: “Online
Privacy and Fake Memories” [http://snapshotsandproject365.blogspot.com/2014/12/online-privacy-and-fake-memories.html]. I
highlighted the issue of fake memories stolen from people.
There
was someone who thought it might have been deceptive, and it was “wrong, but not really a big issue to worry about”.
Being deceptive is not a “big issue”? I find that a little hard to believe,
especially when there are people who believe everything they read/see/hear
online.
Another
point that was made was that the person who shared a photo that wasn’t theirs –
they weren’t the first or last person to do it, that it is a sign of the times
and it won’t change.
That’s
the kind of attitude and complacency that causes it to continue. It’s been
excused so people keep excusing it; they’re so used to it happening it is
second nature.
A
recent case in the news (that’ll I get to later) highlights the lack of concern
we have for this issue when it comes to intellectual property as well as our
rights as people.
There
is a HUGE concern when someone feels a deep need to swipe someone else’s
photos, memories, or even a “life” to represent as their own – deceptive is not
quite adequate – it is FRAUD. It amounts to virtual identity theft. Even if it
isn’t for monetary gain – who is to say it wouldn’t lead there? [More on that
later]
The
person commenting (about it not being a big issue) was only concerned if it was
being used for pedophilia purposes. As long as it wasn’t? “Being in
the nature it was used … it was wrong, but not really a big issue”.
How
about the fact that the people doing this are stealing someone’s family to
represent themselves and becoming a voice for that family? That should worry
anyone that someone else is being their voice.
“Joanna”
(the person who was mentioned in the blog “Online Privacy and Fake Memories”)
was using a picture (that she likely did not own or have permission to use) to
represent herself, a twin brother, and this Lisa “long ago”. And, this “Lisa” perpetuated the scam by
commenting on the photo.
Being
deceptive and dishonest puts the entire online community at risk – in addition,
it is PLAGARISIM. They are STEALING someone else’s work and using it (even if
it isn’t for monetary gain) as their own.
To
be blunt … it is against the law. It is called INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY THEFT. And, it is something the FBI takes seriously.
If
you were to publicly screen your own DVD copy of a movie that you bought – even
if it isn’t for monetary gain (without permission of the distributor) – it’s
still considered illegal. Read this warning (it’s from a WARNER DVD) …
![]() |
| [Picture of FBI warning – taken by me] |
And
one from a CBS/Paramount DVD:
When
someone (like myself) takes PERSONAL photographs, we are the “copyright” holder
– despite the fact it might be a “public” place (Disneyland, etc). That is our
work; that is our intellectual property. The images belong to us. They are for
our use and distribution – no one else has the right to distribute them without
payment and/or attribution use – even then the copyright holder might still
retain their rights.
This
is a good read:
“FBI
Anti-Piracy Warning Seal” – note that it is under the section “Intellectual
Property Theft”
Notice:
“Copyrighted works can include, but are not limited to, films,
audio recordings, electronic media, software, books, photographs, etc.”
… I did. And, it is not a “victimless” crime. Even if it is not for monetary
gain, there are victims involved.
Sounds
serious, doesn’t it? Remember the person who said “wrong, but not really a big issue to worry
about” … they’re wrong. And, they’re wrong in a big way.
To
answer the person who said “sadly a sign of the
times … this will never change” …
Yes
it is a sign of the times, but it can change and you can do something about it – be
more private. Watch what you share with and the people you share to.
Depending
on what network you use and why you use it:
1.) Don’t be available in search (Facebook)
2.) Set “friend requests” to “Friends of Friends” (Facebook)
3.) Watch how many family photos you post and what details
(Facebook &
Twitter)
4.) Maintain the strictest possible privacy (Facebook &
Twitter)
A.) Don’t be afraid to have lists on
Facebook
B.) Don’t be afraid to de-friend or block
on Facebook
5.) Watch who you friend (Facebook)
6.) Lightly watermark your photos (Facebook & Twitter)
7.) If anything seems suspicious – REPORT IT
(Facebook &
Twitter)
Just
because something has been done (and repeatedly) doesn’t mean we should allow
it to continue. We can take precautions by limiting what we do online to impact
that privacy. We can make reports against people as well.
I
don’t think we can stop it entirely, but there is nothing wrong with being
vigilant about it and educating our friends to being a bit more cautious
online.
Oh, and if my blogs aren’t convincing … remember I said something about a recent case in the news highlighting the lack of concern we have for the issue?
How
about this:
“N.M. woman sues over yearbook photo being used on novelty
flask”
[http://www.jrn.com/ktnv/now-trending/NM-woman-sues-over-yearbook-photo-being-used-on-novelty-flask-287828651.html]
[http://www.jrn.com/ktnv/now-trending/NM-woman-sues-over-yearbook-photo-being-used-on-novelty-flask-287828651.html]
Three
more links:
“New Mexico woman sues novelty company for putting her high school portrait on flask”
“New Mexico woman sues novelty company for putting her high school portrait on flask”
“NM woman sues over yearbook photo, novelty flask”
“Woman suing over use of her photo on flask”
Just
because it has happened, doesn’t mean we continue to let it happen.
“Dunn said his office tried to get the issue resolved
before filing the lawsuit, without success.
“I received an email from Anne Taintor at one point when
we first started talking that basically said ‘well, most people find this stuff
funny – get over it.'” Dunn called the company’s response, “a really flippant
way to think about somebody’s reputation.””
I
think Mr. Dunn says it better than I can.
Monday, December 22, 2014
Online Privacy and Fake Memories
NEW UPDATES: Please scroll to the bottom to read the updates!! Something similar was mentioned on the Today show on 2/27/2015.
We
often don’t think about it when we post a photo online via Facebook or Twitter
that someone will come along and snatch it and use it as their own.
Sick?
Absolutely. My mom said it was frightening. She even asked “what is wrong with
those people”.
She’s
right. It is. But, it is very real and I’ve seen it with my own eyes. As far as
what is wrong with them … that is anyone’s guess and only a medical
professional’s opinion.
How’d
we get on to the subject?
I
was talking with a friend Sunday night (12/21) when she questioned the “validity”
of a photo. Basically “Joanna” was claiming that the photo was of herself, a
twin (Janne), and a friend taken “a long time ago”. [As of note, the “Joanna”
account no longer exists on Facebook, so that says something right there –
though perhaps the privacy was locked down].
The
problem? These people are in their 40’s (born in 1970). So, the photo would
HAVE to be about 30-35 years old (1979-1984).
Here’s
the screen-cap:
![]() |
| [While it is dated December 17, 2008 ... that can be backdated. I know, I've done it on Facebook for photo albums] |
Frightening?
Absolutely. It should be.
To
make it more terrifying, the apparent “friend” [Lisa] comments that she
remembers it ... which you can read here:
![]() |
| [Long long time ago? As in when? 2008 or 2014?] |
While
that’d be okay … the photo was taken from a November 2014 blog:
“Stay Safe on the Slopes – Safety Tips for Families” [http://kidproject.org/2014/11/26/stay-safe-slopes-safety-tips-families/]
![]() |
| [Listing from the main BLOG page of the website] |
![]() |
| [Full size photo. Can find it here: http://kidproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/IMG_6331-640x523.jpg] |
Scared now?
Sorry,
but I am hoping you are. Actually, I’m hoping you’re TERRIFIED. This is THAT serious!
I’m
sure this mom would be terrified that her children are being “used” like this –
that someone (Joanna) is claiming to be her children, only a “long time ago”,
and that another person (Lisa) remembers that memory. I’m sorry, but that is
terrifying.
But,
you wonder … if it happened to her … could it happen to you? Is someone using
your children as their own, maybe as their younger selves? Maybe they’re using
your memories as theirs.
That
reminds me of a movie … remember “One Hour Photo”? It was one of Robin
Williams’ movies were he deviates from his normal comedic side.
Here’s
a synopsis from IMDB:
“His favorite customers are the Yorkin family, made up of
husband Will (Michael Vartan), wife Nina (Connie Nielsen), and their son, Jake
(Dylan Smith). He has done their photos for years and, over time, has developed
an obsession with the family; he idolizes their happiness and affluence,
memorizes every personal detail about them that he can learn, and finally
begins to stalk them. Sy secretly makes his own copies of the Yorkins' photos
from the film negatives and then puts them on a wall in his apartment, a
massive collage which has accumulated to over 600 in count. Most of all, he
fantasizes about being a member of their family and sharing in the love he
assumes they must feel.”
That
(and this newest incident) has me thinking about all those photos I share on
Twitter with my “Project: 365” and other “memories”.
Who
else is using those? Thankfully I don’t have a family that I put up there
(kids, husband, parents, etc). And, as far as Facebook? That is locked down.
Only specific people that I know and trust can see my photos. There are some
people I personally know (friends) that I don’t let see certain things. But, it
is cause for concern.
I’d
like to warn this mom … give her “Lisa’s” information and let her report it to
Facebook. But, I also don’t want to invade the mom’s privacy or sound like a
creeper. I mean how would it sound?
However,
the reason I decided to mention this is that some of my friends “friend” a lot
of people on Facebook, publicize their Instagram accounts, and even post on
Twitter. These people have their kids’ names listed, where they go to school,
and sometimes their schedules. Again, that movie comes to mind.
I’m
wondering how many people might have stolen those precious memories and are
using them in a Facebook account talking about their “kids”.
My
friend and I were talking about this while I was watching the prequels of “Star
Wars”. As I sat there watching the movie, crocheting, and spending time with my
mom ... I thought about who might have saved my pictures and used them to make
up their own memories or moments. Whose
daughter am I? Whose mother is she? It can be frightening. It definitely makes
you want to reconsider uploading that cute photo of the kids.
That
was another reason I felt compelled to write this … it could happen to any one
of us. And, the sad thing? “Lisa” never addressed the issue of why that picture
from supposedly a “long time ago” featured someone’s real kids from a November
2014 blog.
If
my blog accomplishes anything I hope you {the reader} take stock of what you
post and your security settings. And, also watch who you friend. While I’ll
admit, I friend some people I haven’t met, I’ve also gotten to know them
through people I have … and their stories check out.
As
with anything – be cautious. Don’t be afraid to set up “lists” on Facebook and
group people accordingly. Watch what you put out there. And, if it seems
strange, yes question it – PLEASE! There are some sick people out there. They
don’t always advertise.
If
you’re not sure, ask a friend’s advice. The worst thing you’ll end up doing is
losing someone who likely should be lost. The best thing? You’ll keep your
family’s memories to yourselves not to mention your safety.
As
far as me? I’m wondering if I want to keep sharing pictures on Twitter …
UPDATE [1:50pm PST]:
After writing this blog nine (9)
hours ago (and half-asleep), someone commented on a Facebook post that perhaps
the individual who did this might be mentally ill. All the more reason in
exercising caution when posting online and who you share to.
And, all the more reason to “warn”
people against friending the person or persons in the photos. After all,
as friends shouldn’t we look out for each other? Especially this time of year?
Although
the “commenter” didn’t see anything wrong with it and pointed out that it wasn’t
like it was a pedophile deal. True it wasn’t.
I will agree to a point ...
But, as I and someone else pointed
out – you can’t say for 100% that the person isn’t trying to lure people in
with a sad tale. And, you can’t say for 100% that they aren’t a child predator.
Why?
Why?
Some things start off innocent.
And, when something BAD happens we say “OH NO! I saw that! I knew something was
wrong/off. I knew it, I felt it. I had this nagging feeling …”
I’d rather be overly cautious than
be a victim. There is NOTHING wrong with exercising caution nor warning people
to take a bit more caution. The worst that happens is that we’re wrong.
But, when it starts off with a lie …
I don’t think it is going to get better.
Again, just my thoughts on that. As
for me? I’m going to tighten my security a bit better.
Another thought I will leave with everyone – IDENTITY THEFT. If that isn’t a cause for concern, I don’t know what is.
Now, to get Twitter to have that nifty little “list” feature.
Here is another “photo” with those kids … (supposedly this “Lisa” with Janne and Joanna) …
And, the direct photo link :
http://blog.snowbasin.com/wp-content/uploads/G0092007-001.jpg
Another thought I will leave with everyone – IDENTITY THEFT. If that isn’t a cause for concern, I don’t know what is.
Now, to get Twitter to have that nifty little “list” feature.
UPDATE:
January 4, 2015
I
just wanted to update this blog to say that I did more research on that “photo”
…
Here
is another link where this blog was featured:
“5
Safety Tips For Families On the Slopes”
Here is another “photo” with those kids … (supposedly this “Lisa” with Janne and Joanna) …
And, the direct photo link :
http://blog.snowbasin.com/wp-content/uploads/G0092007-001.jpg
It
bears repeating that that is in NO way a “long, long ago” picture. I’d venture
a guess that it was in 2014. Definitely not in the 1970’s.
I
am also writing a follow up blog as to my future of “Project: 365” on Twitter.
UPDATE: 2/27/2015 ...
I had to take my car in for service and was waiting on paperwork for a loaner. I heard about "DIGITAL KIDNAPPING" on the TV. Here is the video from the TODAY show:
Here is also an article about it:
UPDATE: 2/27/2015 ...
I had to take my car in for service and was waiting on paperwork for a loaner. I heard about "DIGITAL KIDNAPPING" on the TV. Here is the video from the TODAY show:
I urge everyone to read this blog, share it, and get educated!! This is not just a "minor" matter. This crime has a name. I hope the person who once commented “wrong, but not really a big issue to worry about” ... can now see this is a crime, it has a name, and there are victims.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)















